This week we focused on getting quantitative data. Over the term we have evolved our prototype. This resulted in having four versions. We wanted to test each one to see if our final design is really the best. To start we collected glide ratios for each prototype. We were surprised to see that one of our early prototypes glided better and further than our current prototype. The early prototype glided 15 feet while the current prototype glided only 9 feet. Because of this finding we decided we wanted to test each with a line attached. Just because a kite glides well does not mean it has good control in the air. through this test we found that our current prototype offers more control in the air. We believe this is due to its dihedral shape. The other prototype is flat and had no way of correcting itself when it got off balance. The dihedral shape offered more lateral stability. Taking both tests into account we decided that the current prototype is in fact the better of the two proto
Going into lab this week we had just about every big decision made. We knew the shape of the kite, a slightly modified delta kite with a dihedral angle, the material of the frame, bamboo skewers split in half down the vertical center, and the material of the sail, thin plastic from typical grocery bag. The only thing we still needed to do was figure out how to attach a line and make it user friendly. The challenge we faced here was that the sail is attached to the bottom of our kite. This makes attaching a line to the frame very difficult. To achieve this we would have to poke holes in the sail to send the line through. However, if the line were to move during flight, it could rip the sail more, thus decreasing the kite's overall flight. Through testing we found that a single string attached directly to the kite did not offer the best stability. We also found that, for best results, the string should be attached slightly in front of (closer to nose) the center of gravity of th