Skip to main content

Weekly Update: Week 3

Today we started to build protoypes. We decided to use the lightest grocery bag we have for all protoypes until we decide on a final shape. We will then test that shape with several different plastics to find the one that works best.

Our first protoype was very simple. It was a triangular shape with a long bar down the center, that goes past the triangle. The frame here was made of chopsticks.  We then covered the triangle region with the plastic. The plastic was wrapped around the frame on the deges and taped down. This intial design was too front heavy. To combat this we added another chopstick to the back end of the middle stick. This prototype did not fly.
Figure 1: Protoype 1
In the next prototype we decided to extend the triangular area. To do this we added and extra chopstick to each side and cut a bigger sail. Everything was attached the same way as in prototype one. Once again, the kite was front heavy.  At this point we had run out of chopsticks. As a stand in, we added a pencil, with the eraser removed to the back of the kite. The pencil was much heavier than the chopsticks. This caused the kite to stall. We fixed this by adding 2 small metal clips to the nose of the kite. Initially we had the center of the frame taped to the sail of the kite. We discovered that removing this tape helped the kite to glide better. This prototype flew much better than the first, though there is still much room for improvement.
Figure 2: Prototype 2



Goals for next week include improving the prototype. To do this we are going to try a lighter matieral for the frame as well as a substituting something lighter for the pencil. We also need to attach a string and make sure the kite will fly that way.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Weekly Update: Week 2

This week's lab session was dedicated to research. We did not have our materials, thus we could not start building prototypes just yet. Instead we looked into background information. We found many sites that gave us key information on how and why a kite flies.  We also looked into technical kite terminology. This information helped us to understand why certain kite shapes acts the way they do. Through research, we found that the most successful indoor kites are based off of the Delta wing shape. This style of kite features a triangular shape. This shape allows the kite adjust to changes in wind. Figure 1 shows a an example of a Delta Kite. Figure 1: Example of Delta kite http://intothewind.com/delta-kites This shape maybe useful in our kite design. Our design is inspired by a flying bird. The Delta shape resembles a bird in some ways. A few modifications may be needed, but using this shape is definitely something to think about. ...

Weekly Update: Week 6

This week was focused on further improving our prototype. We kept the same shape of the frame, however we spilt the skewers in half vertically, to make the kite lighter. This allowed the kite to glide further. Figure one shows the current prototype Figure 1: split skewer dihedral frame Another thing we did this week was try different plastics for the sail. We thought if we tried a stronger plastic, the kite would be stronger and more resistant to damage. The plastic we tried was thicker and stiffer than the plastic we had been using to test our prototypes. Figure two shows a comparison of the two plastics. The thinner plastic (brown) is shown on the left and the thicker plastic (white) is shown on the right. This added unnecessary weight and caused the kite to not glide as far. As a team we decided that good flight was better than  strength, in this case.  We took the thicker plastic off and went pack to the original thinner plastic. This is ...

Weekly Update: Week 8

This week we focused on getting quantitative data. Over the term we have evolved our prototype. This resulted in having four versions. We wanted to test each one to see if our final design is really the best. To start we collected glide ratios for each prototype. We were surprised to see that one of our early prototypes glided better and further than our current prototype. The early prototype glided 15 feet while the current prototype glided only 9 feet. Because of this finding we decided we wanted to test each with a line attached. Just because a kite glides well does not mean it has good control in the air. through this test we found that our current prototype offers more control in the air. We believe this is due to its dihedral shape. The other prototype is flat and had no way of correcting itself when it got off balance. The dihedral shape offered more lateral stability. Taking both tests into account we decided that the current prototype is in fact the better of the two proto...